WholeATX · Austin metro · Law Firms
Every law firms business in the Austin metro — ranked by how well their website works for customers and AI search. Looking for one? Start below. Run one? Find your score and what to fix.
2 Austin law firms sites, scored on nine things every search engine and AI assistant checks. Click a name for the full review and the fixes.
| Business | Area | Site score |
|---|---|---|
| Dow Law Firm, PLLC - Round Rockdowlawfirm.com/round-rock-personal-injury-attorney | Round Rock | 802 to fix |
| Law Office of Nels C. Hansen PCwww.austindebt.com | Round Rock | 356 to fix |
70+ solid 45–69 gaps under 45 costing customers
5 businesses with no website we could locate — every one is a customer searching and finding nothing. Not scored, listed as opportunity. Is one of these yours? Get online →
The firms, funds and institutions that set the terms in law firms — context, not local listings; never scored.
A page per practice — commercial litigation, corporate and M&A, venture financings, employment, real estate, energy and regulatory, IP and patent, tax, estate planning, family, criminal defense, personal injury, immigration, bankruptcy. This is how buyers search and the highest-intent pillar; a generic 'we do litigation' page competes with nothing.
Energy and utilities, semiconductors and hardware, software and SaaS, life sciences, real estate and construction, financial services, healthcare, government contracting, hospitality. Industry pages beat practice pages for sophisticated buyers because a GC hires someone who already knows the regulator.
Pre-seed founder, venture-backed growth company, public company, private equity sponsor, family business, municipality, individual consumer. Each has a different budget, a different decision-maker and a different tolerance for hourly billing — and needs its own page.
Austin and Travis County, the Western District of Texas, the Texas Business Court Third Division, the Fifteenth Court of Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, plus statewide and multi-jurisdiction reach. Venue pages carry real search intent and signal that the firm actually appears where the case will be heard.
Intake and conflicts check, engagement letter, investigation, pleadings, discovery and e-discovery, motion practice, mediation, trial or closing, appeal, file closing and retention. Explaining the sequence is the single best trust-builder for a first-time legal buyer.
Hourly, flat, contingency, hybrid, subscription and evergreen retainers, plus trust accounting, expenses and what actually appears on an invoice. Price opacity is the loudest complaint in every client-satisfaction study; a firm that explains fees plainly separates itself immediately.
What Part VII of the Texas Disciplinary Rules permits, what must be filed with the Advertising Review Committee, what may never be said (guaranteed results, unqualified superiority claims, unearned specialist claims), and how testimonials, case results and AI-generated content must be handled. This pillar governs every other pillar.
Bar admissions, board certification through the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, courts of admission, published opinions, speaking, bar leadership and law school. Bios are the most-visited pages on almost every law firm site and the most under-optimized.
Representative matters written so they inform without implying a promise — the hardest editorial problem in legal marketing, because a truthful result stated carelessly becomes an implied guarantee and a rule violation.
How the firm takes and sends referrals, associates co-counsel, and handles fee division — including the written client consent Texas requires. Lawyer-to-lawyer referral is still the largest single source of matters at most firms and almost never gets a page.
Outside counsel guidelines, panel and convergence processes, e-billing and matter budgets, alternative fee proposals, diversity and staffing reporting, security and confidentiality questionnaires. Content aimed at the person who actually runs the RFP.
Practice management, document management, e-discovery, contract lifecycle and legal AI — what the firm uses, how client confidentiality is protected, whether AI time is billed. Clients now ask; a clear published answer is a differentiator and an ethics obligation.
Response time, after-hours coverage, intake questionnaires, conflicts turnaround, communication cadence, portals and status updates. Speed to first contact predicts conversion in legal better than almost any other variable.
Texas legislative sessions, agency rulemaking, new courts and new statutes such as the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act. Timely explainers are the cheapest authority content a firm can produce and the most linkable.
Plain-language guides, checklists, deadline and statute-of-limitations explainers, glossaries, FAQ blocks and short video. Formats that answer a question completely are what answer engines quote and what an anxious buyer actually reads.
Lateral partner hiring, associate recruiting, summer programs, of counsel and non-equity tracks, compensation structure and origination credit. A firm's recruiting pages are read by referral sources and clients as often as by candidates.
answer honestly, including when the answer is no; give the specific markers that change it -- a deadline, a signature, a government agency, an insurer, a criminal exposure, an amount you cannot afford to lose
explain what a consultation can and cannot cover, that no attorney-client relationship exists until there is an engagement, and that a consultation may still create a conflict
explain that the fee is a share of the recovery and that case expenses are usually treated separately; do not state a percentage, because it is negotiated and varies by matter type and stage
distinguish an advance fee deposit held in trust and billed against, from a true non-refundable engagement retainer, and explain what trust accounting means for the reader's money
explain the replenishment mechanic and why firms use it on contested matters, and that it should be written into the engagement letter rather than sprung later
explain certification by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in a defined area, requiring experience, peer review and an examination -- and that it is a specific credential, not a synonym for experienced
no -- explain that in Texas a lawyer may not claim to be a specialist in a way that implies certification unless certified, which is exactly why the phrase on a website matters
explain that limitations periods differ by claim type and that discovery rules, tolling and notice requirements can move the date; give the framework, name the categories, and tell the reader to get the specific date checked -- never publish one deadline as though it covered their situation
mediation is facilitated settlement with no binding outcome; arbitration is a private adjudication that usually is binding and hard to appeal -- and the contract usually decided this before the dispute existed
walk written discovery, document production, e-discovery and depositions, and be honest that document volume and privilege review are what actually drive cost and calendar
scope, fee basis and rates, expenses, who works on the matter, communication expectations, conflicts, termination and file retention
explain that a firm cannot act against an existing client and that even a consultation can disqualify, which is why intake asks for every adverse party's name first
describe it as a statewide specialised trial court with geographic divisions including Austin, created for defined categories of business disputes, with the Fifteenth Court of Appeals hearing its appeals; say jurisdiction depends on the claim type and amount and is still developing, so it is a question for counsel
no, but explain what a demand letter does start -- a record, a possible limitations or notice consequence, and sometimes an insurer's involvement
give the cost drivers -- contested or not, discovery volume, number of parties, venue, expert needs, opposing counsel's posture -- and refuse to publish a figure or a range; a number here is the fastest way for this content to become both wrong and quotable
explain what each fee basis does to incentives and to who carries risk, and that the honest comparison is total expected cost including expenses, not the headline structure
Get your free website score and the exact list of what to fix — no charge, no pitch. Claim your listing or ask for the full report.